Agentic Pentesting: Proofs, Limitations, and Continuous Validation Challenges

Agentic pentesting autonomously identifies and validates exploit paths but faces coverage and speed limitations, highlighting the need for continuous validation against rapidly evolving threats. The article emphasizes that while it provides critical proofs of exploitability, it only covers 20-30% of enterprise environments, necessitating complementary validation methods.

If you’re evaluating an agentic pentesting solution right now, you’ve probably heard the same pitch more than once: point it at a target, and it discovers, validates, and exploits attack paths autonomously, the way a real attacker would.

That promise is worth taking seriously. It’s also worth pressure testing, and three questions do the heavy lifting. 

What can the assessment actually

Read original article